Going round in circles?
The Background to the issue
    - It is difficult to track, quantify and assess the fast moving prices and costs of the arable margin
- Recent harvests have not been sufficient to maintain most arable
    businesses in a viable position with many delaying machinery purchases
    and living off their depreciation.
- The general lack of profitability has driven many to restructure
    through contract farming agreements and more recently by setting up
    labour and machinery syndicates.
Current progressive farm Structures
    - A typical machinery syndicate will consist of
    
        - 3,000 to 5,000 acres consisting of 4 businesses
- Machinery held in a Limited Liability Partnership
- Managed by the son of one of the businesses usually aged early thirties
- Value of machinery per acre around £120 to £150
- One combine backed up by a contractor if required
- Whole area block cropped
- Gross margin on all crops equalised between the businesses
 
- These syndicates have resulted in driving down the costs of
    labour and machinery per acre from an average of £131 per acre and Top
    25% of £118 per acre down to an average for syndicates of £96 per acre
    for the 2007 harvest.
- These restructured businesses should now be well placed to
    capitalise on the arable price increases however have these price
    increases been exhumed by higher input costs?
- Wheat is 55% of the arable area in the Grant Thornton Top 25%
    group therefore the impact of the wheat gross margin can be assessed.
- Input costs of seeds, fertilisers and chemicals on average increase by 58% from 2006 to the 2009 harvest.
- The wheat margin for the 2006 harvest for the Top 25% group was
    £173 per acre (average was £141) and this increases to £286 per acre for
    the 2009 harvest - an increase of 65%
- However fuel costs are likely to rise from £19 per acre to £39
    per acre - an additional £20 per acre or 105% over the 3 year period.
    Add to this an average 4% overall increase in fixed costs and the impact
    on the Net Farm Income is an overall increase of £57% from 2006 to
    2009.
- However it can be argued that the £134 is not a sustainable
    figure to fund farmer drawings, tax, capital repayments on loans and
    reinvestment. Therefore if the 2007 harvest Net Farm Income of £237 is
    taken as a benchmark then the results are a reduction in profitability
    from £237 per acre to £210 per acre - a reduction of 11%
- With increased costs eroding the higher prices the focus must
    not be taken off streamlining businesses, maintaining a balance between
    
        - cost reduction
- timeliness and efficiency
 
- The use of machinery must be flexible in modern farming businesses as areas may change from season to season
- High HP tractors used for short periods in the autumn may be better hired
    
        - to remain flexible
- reduce capital tied up
- tax relief on rentals
- access to up to date models
 
Information and financial examples supplied by:
